Last week he couldn’t add three, two number columns on the increased rebuild cost of Lake Delhi. November 2010: $6,000,000. December 2011: $12,000,000.

Refused to add to the numbers up. Has already made up his mind to fund dam even though the study is not complete, the easements have not been acquired, and there is the same public access as before.

But, I guess we are safe from radios that may have been the best fit for the DNR–or at least had the best buttons.

I was appalled to learn there were no ordinances, leash laws or other policies to deal with excessively aggressive animals.

The outcome? I was told to find another route. We are new to the state of Iowa, but I can tell you I have not lived somewhere where the animal had more rights than the person.

In fact, it was pointed out to me that it was “unusual” to walk/job in the country and that farm dogs have run free for years.

Farm dogs are not the problem. Dogs that repeatedly try to bite people are the problem. Ultimately, I chose another route. This will only lessen the issue for so long – until an unknowing child comes along and gets bit through no fault of their own.

Barry, who do you work for again?

A. If the park is seldom used, and a drain on city funds, it is a good idea to sell the park to Penford.

B. If the park is often used, and not a problem for city funds, then we should keep it to allow a place for children to congregate.

If Situation A is the reality of the park, it is not a good idea to prevent Penford from expanding simply because the Czech Musuem doesn’t like having a manufacturing facility across the street.

Museums are self contained entities employing small staffs due to small profits.

Penford is a large business creating large amounts of revenue, employing 225 citizens, and acting as an important cog in the workings of businesses nationwide.

Why then do American universities who treasure academic freedom make deal after deal with China? The University of Michigan has a joint campus in Shanghai that was the source of the cyber attacks on Google last year. There are many other American universities that have similar deals with China. Read more at http://www.china-threat.com

(EXCERPTS)

” The matter before this Court has nothing to do with the birth place of the Defendant, nor does it assert that he is not a citizen of the United States. In fact, limited to this challenged primary election, the Plaintiff will stipulate that the Defendant was born in Hawaii, that the Defendant is a U.S. Citizen, and that the Defendant was Constitutionally-qualified​ to serve as a U.S. Senator.

The Plaintiff makes no assertion regarding the Defendant’s passports, or social security number, or any other fact related to the Defendant, other than the one fact asserted at the beginning of this opposition: that the Defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen.

Contrary to the Defendant’s assertions, the issue presented by the Plaintiff is grounded on one uncontestable fact, and one clear definition from the U.S. Supreme Court. See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875).

Despite all of his attempts to misdirect this Court from the one substantive issue presented, the Defendant has failed to present grounds for dismissal. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court consider his simple yet critically important grounds to prohibit the Defendant from appearing on the Georgia ballot:

It is undisputed that President Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. To Plaintiffs’ knowledge Mr. Obama has never denied the fact that his father was not a U.S. Citizen, nor has he ever made any statements contrary to this fact.

The U.S. Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.” See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875).

The Court in Happersett did go on to state that other sub-categories of people may or may not be within the broader term “citizen.” However, it did so only after specifically identifying the narrower category “natural-born citizens.” Id. The Happersett Court clearly understood and established that “citizen” is a much broader term than “natural-born citizens.”

Its discussion of “citizen” does not negate or alter its earlier definition of the term “natural-born citizens.” See Id. at 167-168. This precedent has never been questioned by any subsequent Supreme Court.

This precedent is binding.

Because it is undisputed that Mr. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, the Defendant can never be a natural-born citizen, as that term was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Therefore, the Defendant cannot meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President. See U.S. Const. Art. II Section 1.5 Georgia election code requires such a candidate to be stricken from any Georgia ballot. §21-2-5.”
http://​libertylegalfoundation.org/​wp-content/uploads/2011/10/​Welden-GA-Opp.-Mtn.-Dismiss​-1.4.pdf

Barack Hussein Obamas motion to dismiss eligibility challenge DENIED:
Fox News’ Bret Baier: Georgia Ballot Access Challenge Against Obama Gets Hearing
http://youtu.be/​2KhFneWERAU

When do individual freedom of choice get lost to the claims of protect health, protect security and all the other flags that get raised in the claim of the betterment of society?

I am not a smoker nor do I use these types of products. But if I wanted to I should be allowed the choice not have that choice made for me.

Really? Because today school obviously should have been delayed and it wasn’t. So much for that promise.

Also have just had bathroom done and there is still some grey grout on the black floor tiles that we’ve cleaned loads but is not coming up. Has anyone used something that has removed grout well?
Thanks.